An email today from Sharon Ford Watkins of the National Breast Cancer Coalition is requesting input on defining the 2013 Legislative and Public Policy priorities. The fact that they are asking the “masses” what we think is a good thing. The fact that the “masses” have not yet been heard on the topic of metastatic breast cancer – not so good. Below you will find my response to their request.
You don’t know me, but I have been an eager and vocal supporter of NBCC for the last four years or so. As soon as I had learned about NBCC I knew I had found an organization that “got it” and a place where my voice would reach much further and deeper than it ever could on my own.
When Deadline 2020 was launched I, along with so many others, stood with NBCC in supporting and even justifying the strategy. As a LEAD graduate, both my advocacy and my own healthcare have benefited from what you have taught me. With the skills and encouragement found at the annual Advocacy Summit I have launched a blog, served on peer review with the Department of Defense, attended the 33rd San Antonio Breast Cancer symposium, and found a place for myself in a variety of specific breast cancer communities/organizations. I know my annual membership and limited monthly contribution cannot begin to cover your investment in me. For all of this, I thank you.
I was devastated by the email you sent today requesting feedback on Legislative and Public Policy priorities for the coming year. In it you state:
As you know, in 2010, NBCC set a deadline and developed a strategic plan to end breast cancer by 2020. The plan focuses on primary prevention, stopping women from getting breast cancer, and understanding and preventing metastasis (the spread of cancer), which is responsible for 90% of breast cancer deaths. Recommendations for 2013 should take into account how the proposed priority moves our plan towards meeting the overall goal of Breast Cancer Deadline 2020—ending breast cancer by January 1, 2020. (Emphasis mine)
I have spoken out on this matter before (Life on the Margins) and I thought in the past year we had seen improvement, but this was a major slide backwards; one that has me on the edge of withdrawing my support in shame.
As you state in your own email, metastatic breast cancer is responsible for 90% of breast cancer deaths. (One might argue that number is even higher…) You also share that your “plan” focuses on the prevention of mets. A lofty and worthy goal, to be sure. And a goal that leaves the estimated 162,000 of us living with mets in the dirt, trampled by the stampede of sexier topics like the Artemis vaccine. Your recurring choice to focus on the prevention of metastatic breast cancer quite simply writes off our lives.
Part of what drew me to NBCC was my sense that priorities were set based on science, on objective need not impulsive topics that “sell.” Part of what will send me away is to see you sell you like so many other breast cancer organizations have. Please, Sharon, don’t allow NBCC to douse itself in the same pink rhetoric we see everywhere. Women die from mets; let’s focus our attention on the real issue at hand. Let’s tackle what kills us…